<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should I Remove ETags From My Headers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cloudfour.com/should-i-remove-etags-from-my-headers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cloudfour.com/should-i-remove-etags-from-my-headers/</link>
	<description>Expert Web and Mobile Design, Development and Strategy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 22:58:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudfour.com/should-i-remove-etags-from-my-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-14956</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 12:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudfour.com/?p=110#comment-14956</guid>
		<description>If I remove Etags does this mean I will remove any last modified headers that the search engines use?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remove Etags does this mean I will remove any last modified headers that the search engines use?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AskApache</title>
		<link>http://www.cloudfour.com/should-i-remove-etags-from-my-headers/comment-page-1/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>AskApache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 02:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cloudfour.com/?p=110#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Since &lt;strong&gt;our strategy is to provide a far futures cache expiration date&lt;/strong&gt;, I am perfectly comfortable removing the ETags.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Bingo! All that validation is impressive, works wonderfully, and does make sure visitors have the latest versions... But that is more than alot of overkill for most websites.  Unless you are a proxying/caching server or have some other unique freshness requirements, you should only choose 1 method of cache validation (etags, last-modified, md5-digest, etc..) and of course setting future expires headers (even if only for 24 hours) means your visitors and server will have 24-hours of connectionless exchange without wasting CPU, bandwidth, etc..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Since <strong>our strategy is to provide a far futures cache expiration date</strong>, I am perfectly comfortable removing the ETags.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bingo! All that validation is impressive, works wonderfully, and does make sure visitors have the latest versions&#8230; But that is more than alot of overkill for most websites.  Unless you are a proxying/caching server or have some other unique freshness requirements, you should only choose 1 method of cache validation (etags, last-modified, md5-digest, etc..) and of course setting future expires headers (even if only for 24 hours) means your visitors and server will have 24-hours of connectionless exchange without wasting CPU, bandwidth, etc..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

